<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258414</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution by the first respondent but set aside the order and granted the petitioner another opportunity to be heard. The Court directed the first respondent to schedule a hearing, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s obligation to attend, with failure resulting in the reinstatement of the dismissal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258414</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution by the first respondent but set aside the order and granted the petitioner another opportunity to be heard. The Court directed the first respondent to schedule a hearing, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s obligation to attend, with failure resulting in the reinstatement of the dismissal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>