<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 294 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258412</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the Development Agreement did not result in a taxable transfer under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that since the Developer had not initiated any development activities and no consideration had accrued, the assessee was not liable for capital gains tax in the relevant assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 294 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258412</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the Development Agreement did not result in a taxable transfer under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act. It was held that since the Developer had not initiated any development activities and no consideration had accrued, the assessee was not liable for capital gains tax in the relevant assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>