<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169252</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the challenged section of the Bihar State Universities (University of Bihar, Bhagalpur, and Ranchi) (Amendment) Act, 1962 to be constitutional under Article 14, limiting the Chancellor&#039;s powers and rationalizing the specified dates. The Court upheld the order dated February 18, 1963, as valid after ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Court interpreted the Statutes to grant permanent equivalence of qualifications for the appellant, deeming him qualified for the Principal&#039;s post. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the Chancellor&#039;s order was quashed, with costs awarded to the appellant from the respondent University.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169252</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the challenged section of the Bihar State Universities (University of Bihar, Bhagalpur, and Ranchi) (Amendment) Act, 1962 to be constitutional under Article 14, limiting the Chancellor&#039;s powers and rationalizing the specified dates. The Court upheld the order dated February 18, 1963, as valid after ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Court interpreted the Statutes to grant permanent equivalence of qualifications for the appellant, deeming him qualified for the Principal&#039;s post. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the Chancellor&#039;s order was quashed, with costs awarded to the appellant from the respondent University.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>