https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169251 Documentary entries alone did not establish title to Survey No. 134 where earlier survey records omitted the appellant's family name and surrounding circumstances showed possession only in a fiduciary capacity as manager of the Dargah. The Court held that a party withholding material documents in its possession may face an adverse inference, and a bare plea on burden of proof is insufficient when the best evidence is suppressed. On that basis, Survey No. 134 was treated as the property of the Dargah and not of the appellant. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:20:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169251 Documentary entries alone did not establish title to Survey No. 134 where earlier survey records omitted the appellant's family name and surrounding circumstances showed possession only in a fiduciary capacity as manager of the Dargah. The Court held that a party withholding material documents in its possession may face an adverse inference, and a bare plea on burden of proof is insufficient when the best evidence is suppressed. On that basis, Survey No. 134 was treated as the property of the Dargah and not of the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169251