https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169249 The Supreme Court held that K.N. Srivastava did not meet the qualifications required for appointment as a Judge of Gauhati High Court, as he did not have the necessary ten years of experience in a judicial office. Additionally, the Court found that the mandatory consultation process under the Constitution was not followed properly, lacking full and effective consultation. Srivastava's claim of holding a judicial office was also rejected. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, declaring Srivastava unqualified for the appointment, quashing his appointment, and directing authorities not to administer the oath or allow him to assume office as a Judge of the High Court. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169249 The Supreme Court held that K.N. Srivastava did not meet the qualifications required for appointment as a Judge of Gauhati High Court, as he did not have the necessary ten years of experience in a judicial office. Additionally, the Court found that the mandatory consultation process under the Constitution was not followed properly, lacking full and effective consultation. Srivastava's claim of holding a judicial office was also rejected. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, declaring Srivastava unqualified for the appointment, quashing his appointment, and directing authorities not to administer the oath or allow him to assume office as a Judge of the High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169249