https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169248 The court upheld the conviction of Haroon based on accomplice testimony connecting him to smuggling operations. Statements of co-accused were deemed voluntary and admissible, with retracted confessions considered corroborative evidence. Section 30 of the Evidence Act allowed admission of co-accused confessions. Corroboration from various sources, including accomplice testimony, supported the verdict. The court found evidence against Haroon sufficient and dismissed the appeal, ordering his surrender. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:33:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169248 The court upheld the conviction of Haroon based on accomplice testimony connecting him to smuggling operations. Statements of co-accused were deemed voluntary and admissible, with retracted confessions considered corroborative evidence. Section 30 of the Evidence Act allowed admission of co-accused confessions. Corroboration from various sources, including accomplice testimony, supported the verdict. The court found evidence against Haroon sufficient and dismissed the appeal, ordering his surrender. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169248