https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169246 Rule III(3) of the Indian Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Rules, which allows the Registrar to withhold the names of arbitrators from a non-member party until arbitration commences, was treated as a procedural safeguard rather than an infringement of the Indian Arbitration Act or natural justice. The rule did not oust the court's powers under Sections 5 and 11, and objections based on misconduct, bias, or prejudice could still be raised when the proper stage arose. The arbitration agreement remained valid and effective, and the challenge to the rule failed. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:22:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169246 Rule III(3) of the Indian Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Rules, which allows the Registrar to withhold the names of arbitrators from a non-member party until arbitration commences, was treated as a procedural safeguard rather than an infringement of the Indian Arbitration Act or natural justice. The rule did not oust the court's powers under Sections 5 and 11, and objections based on misconduct, bias, or prejudice could still be raised when the proper stage arose. The arbitration agreement remained valid and effective, and the challenge to the rule failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169246