<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169245</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found that the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 were not maintainable as the order in question was not appealable under the specified sections. Additionally, the Court ruled that the land held by the appellants was not covered by the Act, 1960, as it was recorded under a different statute. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeals, overturning the decisions of the High Court and Additional Commissioner, while permitting the respondent to challenge the Prescribed Authority&#039;s order through appropriate means.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169245</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found that the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 were not maintainable as the order in question was not appealable under the specified sections. Additionally, the Court ruled that the land held by the appellants was not covered by the Act, 1960, as it was recorded under a different statute. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeals, overturning the decisions of the High Court and Additional Commissioner, while permitting the respondent to challenge the Prescribed Authority&#039;s order through appropriate means.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>