https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169239 In preventive detention matters, the detenu must receive all material particulars necessary for an effective representation under Article 22(5), but an affidavit may explain the same operative incident without invalidating detention if it does not suppress basic facts. On the facts noted, the communication of grounds was treated as adequate. The Court also applied the requirement that detention must rest on a real and honest subjective satisfaction with a rational nexus to the statutory purpose, and held that theft of strategic railway signal equipment was not a trivial incident but could reasonably support preventive detention. The detention order was therefore sustained. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:04:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169239 In preventive detention matters, the detenu must receive all material particulars necessary for an effective representation under Article 22(5), but an affidavit may explain the same operative incident without invalidating detention if it does not suppress basic facts. On the facts noted, the communication of grounds was treated as adequate. The Court also applied the requirement that detention must rest on a real and honest subjective satisfaction with a rational nexus to the statutory purpose, and held that theft of strategic railway signal equipment was not a trivial incident but could reasonably support preventive detention. The detention order was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169239