<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver and stay to the appellant against a demand of duty amounting to Rs. 56,13,393 for the period from July 2006 to March 2010. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the plea of limitation and their belief in good faith about the admissibility of the SSI benefit under Notification No.8/2003-CE for plastic bottles cleared under the Shalimar brand. Consequently, the waiver and stay were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver and stay to the appellant against a demand of duty amounting to Rs. 56,13,393 for the period from July 2006 to March 2010. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the plea of limitation and their belief in good faith about the admissibility of the SSI benefit under Notification No.8/2003-CE for plastic bottles cleared under the Shalimar brand. Consequently, the waiver and stay were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>