<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 273 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258391</link>
    <description>A completed share transfer supported by consideration, bank entries, endorsed certificates and register entries was treated as effective despite alleged non-compliance with transfer formalities, and rectification of the register was rejected. The note also states that a petition for oppression and mismanagement was not maintainable where the claimant was no longer a member at the filing date and had delayed the action despite earlier knowledge of the transfer. Separate reliance was placed on lack of clean hands: inconsistent pleadings, retention of the transfer consideration, and non-disclosure of material facts were treated as inequitable conduct, causing the composite petition to fail in entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 273 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258391</link>
      <description>A completed share transfer supported by consideration, bank entries, endorsed certificates and register entries was treated as effective despite alleged non-compliance with transfer formalities, and rectification of the register was rejected. The note also states that a petition for oppression and mismanagement was not maintainable where the claimant was no longer a member at the filing date and had delayed the action despite earlier knowledge of the transfer. Separate reliance was placed on lack of clean hands: inconsistent pleadings, retention of the transfer consideration, and non-disclosure of material facts were treated as inequitable conduct, causing the composite petition to fail in entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>