<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that channel placement charges are subject to TDS under Section 194C, not Section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the correct TDS deduction by the assessee. Consequently, the assessee was not held liable under Section 201(1) and 201(1A). The cross-objections were deemed academic due to the favorable ruling on the primary issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:26:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that channel placement charges are subject to TDS under Section 194C, not Section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the correct TDS deduction by the assessee. Consequently, the assessee was not held liable under Section 201(1) and 201(1A). The cross-objections were deemed academic due to the favorable ruling on the primary issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>