<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 228 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169225</link>
    <description>Unexplained and inordinate delay in considering a detenu&#039;s representation under the National Security Act vitiates preventive detention. A representation addressed to the President is a valid representation to the Central Government, whose power to revoke detention operates as an additional constitutional safeguard. Although some time may be required to transmit the matter to the concerned Ministry, prolonged inaction must be explained by affidavit or record material. Here, the delay of about two months after receipt in the President&#039;s and Prime Minister&#039;s Secretariats remained wholly unexplained, so the continued detention was held illegal and release was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 228 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169225</link>
      <description>Unexplained and inordinate delay in considering a detenu&#039;s representation under the National Security Act vitiates preventive detention. A representation addressed to the President is a valid representation to the Central Government, whose power to revoke detention operates as an additional constitutional safeguard. Although some time may be required to transmit the matter to the concerned Ministry, prolonged inaction must be explained by affidavit or record material. Here, the delay of about two months after receipt in the President&#039;s and Prime Minister&#039;s Secretariats remained wholly unexplained, so the continued detention was held illegal and release was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>