https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169220 Legislation targeting terrorism and disruptive activity was treated as a distinct response to grave threats to the sovereignty and integrity of India, so it was not confined to the State List public order field and was supported by Parliament's residuary power. Special procedures on confession, in camera proceedings, witness anonymity, arrest, bail, and Designated Courts were broadly upheld as valid for a specially classified category of offences, subject to fairness and rational nexus requirements. The exclusion of anticipatory bail and stricter bail conditions were sustained. The provision permitting identification through photographs was held unfair and unreasonable and was invalidated. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Feb 2026 13:04:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169220 Legislation targeting terrorism and disruptive activity was treated as a distinct response to grave threats to the sovereignty and integrity of India, so it was not confined to the State List public order field and was supported by Parliament's residuary power. Special procedures on confession, in camera proceedings, witness anonymity, arrest, bail, and Designated Courts were broadly upheld as valid for a specially classified category of offences, subject to fairness and rational nexus requirements. The exclusion of anticipatory bail and stricter bail conditions were sustained. The provision permitting identification through photographs was held unfair and unreasonable and was invalidated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169220