<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 763 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169219</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the cancellation of the respondent&#039;s Intermediate Examination result was justified due to the fraud involved and lack of equity in his favor. The respondent&#039;s subsequent academic and professional achievements did not warrant setting aside the cancellation. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the High Court and the learned Single Judge were set aside, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 23:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 763 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169219</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the cancellation of the respondent&#039;s Intermediate Examination result was justified due to the fraud involved and lack of equity in his favor. The respondent&#039;s subsequent academic and professional achievements did not warrant setting aside the cancellation. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the High Court and the learned Single Judge were set aside, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>