<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169210</link>
    <description>An interim injunction does not automatically revive when a suit dismissed for default is restored. The text distinguishes ancillary orders, which support the main adjudication and may continue on restoration, from supplemental proceedings such as temporary injunctions and attachment before judgment, which affect substantive rights and third-party interests and therefore do not survive unless the court expressly directs revival. In the absence of a statutory mandate or specific judicial order, restoration of the suit does not reactivate such interlocutory relief. The stated result is that the injunction did not revive automatically and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169210</link>
      <description>An interim injunction does not automatically revive when a suit dismissed for default is restored. The text distinguishes ancillary orders, which support the main adjudication and may continue on restoration, from supplemental proceedings such as temporary injunctions and attachment before judgment, which affect substantive rights and third-party interests and therefore do not survive unless the court expressly directs revival. In the absence of a statutory mandate or specific judicial order, restoration of the suit does not reactivate such interlocutory relief. The stated result is that the injunction did not revive automatically and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>