https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169208 The Supreme Court of India held that the transfer of a High Court Judge without their consent is constitutional if in the public interest. Effective consultation with the Chief Justice of India is mandatory under Article 222(1). The court emphasized meaningful consultation and the provision of relevant data to the Chief Justice. The appeal was settled with the government proposing to transfer Justice Sheth back to the Gujarat High Court. Judicial independence and the judiciary's role in upholding the Constitution were highlighted by the judges in their separate opinions. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:42:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169208 The Supreme Court of India held that the transfer of a High Court Judge without their consent is constitutional if in the public interest. Effective consultation with the Chief Justice of India is mandatory under Article 222(1). The court emphasized meaningful consultation and the provision of relevant data to the Chief Justice. The appeal was settled with the government proposing to transfer Justice Sheth back to the Gujarat High Court. Judicial independence and the judiciary's role in upholding the Constitution were highlighted by the judges in their separate opinions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169208