https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169207 The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' does not automatically apply solely based on similar job roles. Educational qualifications and recruitment sources can justify different pay scales. The Court emphasized the validity of differentiation based on educational qualifications, stating that it is constitutionally permissible. Judicial review does not extend to challenging executive decisions on post qualifications unless there is a clear constitutional violation. The Court stressed the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to binding precedents. Equitable considerations and delay in filing writ petitions were also taken into account. Ultimately, the Court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the appeal without costs. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169207 The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of 'equal pay for equal work' does not automatically apply solely based on similar job roles. Educational qualifications and recruitment sources can justify different pay scales. The Court emphasized the validity of differentiation based on educational qualifications, stating that it is constitutionally permissible. Judicial review does not extend to challenging executive decisions on post qualifications unless there is a clear constitutional violation. The Court stressed the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to binding precedents. Equitable considerations and delay in filing writ petitions were also taken into account. Ultimately, the Court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169207