<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 636 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169206</link>
    <description>Section 4(4) of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1956 gives the Market Committee an overriding power to require a Municipality or Grama Panchayat to transfer land or buildings in its possession that were earlier used for a similar purpose and lie within a notified market area. The special scheme for regulating buying and selling of agricultural produce prevails over the general powers of a Municipality under the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950. The presence of some non-agricultural produce in the market does not take the matter outside the statutory framework, and a dominant-object argument raised for the first time in appeal is not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 636 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169206</link>
      <description>Section 4(4) of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1956 gives the Market Committee an overriding power to require a Municipality or Grama Panchayat to transfer land or buildings in its possession that were earlier used for a similar purpose and lie within a notified market area. The special scheme for regulating buying and selling of agricultural produce prevails over the general powers of a Municipality under the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950. The presence of some non-agricultural produce in the market does not take the matter outside the statutory framework, and a dominant-object argument raised for the first time in appeal is not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>