<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169202</link>
    <description>The Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 was examined as an integrated planning code for orderly urban development, not as a set of isolated restrictions. The scheme of survey, draft development plan publication, public objections, expert consideration, State sanction, acquisition machinery for reserved land, and control over development through commencement certificates was found to provide adequate guidance and procedural safeguards. The ten-year period for acquisition was treated as reasonable in light of large-scale town planning and limited municipal resources. On that basis, sections 9 to 13 were held valid, and the challenges based on equality and property rights failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169202</link>
      <description>The Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 was examined as an integrated planning code for orderly urban development, not as a set of isolated restrictions. The scheme of survey, draft development plan publication, public objections, expert consideration, State sanction, acquisition machinery for reserved land, and control over development through commencement certificates was found to provide adequate guidance and procedural safeguards. The ten-year period for acquisition was treated as reasonable in light of large-scale town planning and limited municipal resources. On that basis, sections 9 to 13 were held valid, and the challenges based on equality and property rights failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>