<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 204 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169200</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside a deed of adoption due to Mansaram&#039;s lack of mental capacity at the time of execution. The Court found the deed invalid as crucial details were missing, and Mansaram displayed confusion and inconsistency, indicating unsound mind. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that High Courts should not interfere with factual findings unless overwhelming evidence supports a different conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 204 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169200</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside a deed of adoption due to Mansaram&#039;s lack of mental capacity at the time of execution. The Court found the deed invalid as crucial details were missing, and Mansaram displayed confusion and inconsistency, indicating unsound mind. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that High Courts should not interfere with factual findings unless overwhelming evidence supports a different conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>