https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258363 The Court condoned the delay in filing Central Excise Appeals, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal by CESTAT within six months. It addressed the validity of extending stay orders beyond 365 days, interpreting Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the impact of the Finance Act, 2013. Despite acknowledging the backlog and limited benches, the Court directed CESTAT to prioritize high-value cases, decide appeals promptly, and avoid unnecessary adjournments, maintaining the waiver of pre-deposit until final disposal. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258363 The Court condoned the delay in filing Central Excise Appeals, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal by CESTAT within six months. It addressed the validity of extending stay orders beyond 365 days, interpreting Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the impact of the Finance Act, 2013. Despite acknowledging the backlog and limited benches, the Court directed CESTAT to prioritize high-value cases, decide appeals promptly, and avoid unnecessary adjournments, maintaining the waiver of pre-deposit until final disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258363