https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258349 The Commission determined a prima facie contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, by the Opposite Party, a subsidiary of DLF Limited, in the commercial real estate market in Gurgaon. It found that the Opposite Party imposed unfair terms in agreements with buyers, evidencing abuse of its dominant position. The relevant market was defined as the development and sale of commercial space in Gurgaon, where DLF held a dominant position. The Commission directed the Director General to conduct an investigation within 60 days to further examine the allegations and the involvement of the Opposite Party's officials, emphasizing that these findings were preliminary and not a final judgment on the matter. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Apr 2015 06:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258349 The Commission determined a prima facie contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, by the Opposite Party, a subsidiary of DLF Limited, in the commercial real estate market in Gurgaon. It found that the Opposite Party imposed unfair terms in agreements with buyers, evidencing abuse of its dominant position. The relevant market was defined as the development and sale of commercial space in Gurgaon, where DLF held a dominant position. The Commission directed the Director General to conduct an investigation within 60 days to further examine the allegations and the involvement of the Opposite Party's officials, emphasizing that these findings were preliminary and not a final judgment on the matter. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258349