<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258346</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially successful, with the court ruling in favor of the revenue on issues regarding the perquisite value of motor car disallowance and depreciation on the guest house. However, all other issues, including the exclusion of other income items for Section 80-I deduction and investment allowance for non-manufacturing items, were decided in favor of the assessee. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258346</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially successful, with the court ruling in favor of the revenue on issues regarding the perquisite value of motor car disallowance and depreciation on the guest house. However, all other issues, including the exclusion of other income items for Section 80-I deduction and investment allowance for non-manufacturing items, were decided in favor of the assessee. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>