<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 220 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for re-verification of the agricultural status of the land and its qualification as a capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of all relevant documents and evidence before determining the tax implications related to the land transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 05:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 220 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for re-verification of the agricultural status of the land and its qualification as a capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of all relevant documents and evidence before determining the tax implications related to the land transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>