<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1103 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the issue of share application money for two individuals for re-adjudication due to discrepancies in evidence and lack of proof of exemption under section 10(26) for the other two individuals. The deletion made by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was reversed for the latter two individuals based on insufficient evidence to prove the source of their investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:59:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1103 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the issue of share application money for two individuals for re-adjudication due to discrepancies in evidence and lack of proof of exemption under section 10(26) for the other two individuals. The deletion made by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was reversed for the latter two individuals based on insufficient evidence to prove the source of their investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>