<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1108 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was based on estimated additions without concrete evidence of misconduct. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be solely imposed on estimations without proving the assessee&#039;s conduct. The decision aligned with established legal principles, citing case law precedent. The penalty of Rs. 83,000 was deleted, highlighting the necessity of substantial evidence for penalty imposition in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1108 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was based on estimated additions without concrete evidence of misconduct. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be solely imposed on estimations without proving the assessee&#039;s conduct. The decision aligned with established legal principles, citing case law precedent. The penalty of Rs. 83,000 was deleted, highlighting the necessity of substantial evidence for penalty imposition in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>