<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1114 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed the allowance of 80% depreciation on wind mills and deemed the reassessment under section 147 as invalid. The AO&#039;s lack of valid reasons to believe income escapement led to the conclusion that the reassessment was unfounded, as the depreciation was consistent with previous years and did not require a specific form for the claimed percentage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1114 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed the allowance of 80% depreciation on wind mills and deemed the reassessment under section 147 as invalid. The AO&#039;s lack of valid reasons to believe income escapement led to the conclusion that the reassessment was unfounded, as the depreciation was consistent with previous years and did not require a specific form for the claimed percentage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>