<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 936 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the estimated additions of husk value and stock difference were unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence and proper explanation. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 936 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the estimated additions of husk value and stock difference were unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence and proper explanation. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>