https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169156 The appeal was filed against the order of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The Assessee, a trust and proprietor of a manufacturing business, declared a net loss but faced scrutiny due to a discrepancy in job work income. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 7,30,022 as income, upheld by CIT(A). The ITAT remitted the issue for reexamination, emphasizing fair assessment. Regarding the disallowance of Rs. 20,000 out of vehicle expenses, the Assessee did not press the ground, leading to its dismissal. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of providing complete documentation during assessments and active participation in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:04:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169156 The appeal was filed against the order of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The Assessee, a trust and proprietor of a manufacturing business, declared a net loss but faced scrutiny due to a discrepancy in job work income. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 7,30,022 as income, upheld by CIT(A). The ITAT remitted the issue for reexamination, emphasizing fair assessment. Regarding the disallowance of Rs. 20,000 out of vehicle expenses, the Assessee did not press the ground, leading to its dismissal. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of providing complete documentation during assessments and active participation in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169156