<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169159</link>
    <description>An air travel agent&#039;s discount passed on to customers was treated as a reduction in the ticket sale price, not commission for services rendered. On that basis, section 194H did not apply because the customer merely received a lower price and did not perform any service for the agent. As no commission existed, the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), and the TDS demand could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169159</link>
      <description>An air travel agent&#039;s discount passed on to customers was treated as a reduction in the ticket sale price, not commission for services rendered. On that basis, section 194H did not apply because the customer merely received a lower price and did not perform any service for the agent. As no commission existed, the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), and the TDS demand could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>