<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 823 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed for treating certain allowances as income was not justified. The Tribunal considered a letter from the employer specifying that the allowances were reimbursements, not income. As the allowances were shown as reimbursements, they could not be treated as income under the salary head. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unsustainable and subsequently deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 823 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed for treating certain allowances as income was not justified. The Tribunal considered a letter from the employer specifying that the allowances were reimbursements, not income. As the allowances were shown as reimbursements, they could not be treated as income under the salary head. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unsustainable and subsequently deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>