<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1140 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168988</link>
    <description>Timely compliance with a scheme cut-off date was established where cheques for admitted tax and penalty were tendered with a covering letter before the deadline and the department received and realised the amounts. The absence of a separate application or acknowledgement did not defeat the claim when contemporaneous documents and realised payments proved payment within time. On that basis, entitlement to the Kara Samadhana Scheme was upheld and the revisional order restoring the penalty was treated as perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:47:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1140 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168988</link>
      <description>Timely compliance with a scheme cut-off date was established where cheques for admitted tax and penalty were tendered with a covering letter before the deadline and the department received and realised the amounts. The absence of a separate application or acknowledgement did not defeat the claim when contemporaneous documents and realised payments proved payment within time. On that basis, entitlement to the Kara Samadhana Scheme was upheld and the revisional order restoring the penalty was treated as perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>