<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1141 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168989</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the Sales Tax Tribunal had the jurisdiction to execute its own orders based on legal principles, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s authority to implement its orders even without an explicit provision. The petitioner was advised to seek remedy directly from the Tribunal for execution. The petition was disposed of in line with the established legal position, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s power to enforce its orders effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1141 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168989</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the Sales Tax Tribunal had the jurisdiction to execute its own orders based on legal principles, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s authority to implement its orders even without an explicit provision. The petitioner was advised to seek remedy directly from the Tribunal for execution. The petition was disposed of in line with the established legal position, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s power to enforce its orders effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>