https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168997 Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against assessment orders after asserting defective service under Rule 19(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules, 2007. The court did not examine the merits of the assessments or the rectification rejection, but directed that appeals be filed with applications for condonation of delay and considered on merits rather than being rejected on limitation. Entertainment of the appeals was made subject to deposit of 50 per cent of the tax amount, if unpaid. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:47:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168997 Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against assessment orders after asserting defective service under Rule 19(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules, 2007. The court did not examine the merits of the assessments or the rectification rejection, but directed that appeals be filed with applications for condonation of delay and considered on merits rather than being rejected on limitation. Entertainment of the appeals was made subject to deposit of 50 per cent of the tax amount, if unpaid. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168997