<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1092 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169017</link>
    <description>A one-time sale of a used car by a timber dealer was held not to be taxable business turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act because it was unconnected with the assessee&#039;s regular business and lacked the indicia of business activity, including volume, frequency, continuity, regularity and profit motive. Although the statutory definition of dealer includes a casual trader, occasional transactions must still be of a business nature; a solitary disposal of a vehicle does not satisfy that test. The tax liability on the isolated sale was therefore deleted and the assessee was not treated as either a dealer or a casual dealer under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1092 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169017</link>
      <description>A one-time sale of a used car by a timber dealer was held not to be taxable business turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act because it was unconnected with the assessee&#039;s regular business and lacked the indicia of business activity, including volume, frequency, continuity, regularity and profit motive. Although the statutory definition of dealer includes a casual trader, occasional transactions must still be of a business nature; a solitary disposal of a vehicle does not satisfy that test. The tax liability on the isolated sale was therefore deleted and the assessee was not treated as either a dealer or a casual dealer under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>