https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169048 Writ interference was declined against cancellation of permission to pay tax at compounded rates and the consequential assessment proceedings because the competent authority had already exercised the statutory power and an effective statutory remedy was available. The petitioner's grievance was held to be one that should be pursued before the appropriate forum, and no exceptional ground for writ intervention was shown. The court therefore refused to entertain the challenge in writ jurisdiction, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue the statutory remedy. en-us Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:08:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169048 Writ interference was declined against cancellation of permission to pay tax at compounded rates and the consequential assessment proceedings because the competent authority had already exercised the statutory power and an effective statutory remedy was available. The petitioner's grievance was held to be one that should be pursued before the appropriate forum, and no exceptional ground for writ intervention was shown. The court therefore refused to entertain the challenge in writ jurisdiction, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue the statutory remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169048