https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169049 The court found that the first respondent's actions lacked adherence to principles of natural justice and fairness by not providing adequate opportunity for a hearing before passing revised assessment orders. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The first respondent was directed to schedule a new hearing, ensuring the petitioner's timely notification and submission of relevant documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the first respondent was required to issue appropriate orders in compliance with the law, with no costs imposed on the parties. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:08:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169049 The court found that the first respondent's actions lacked adherence to principles of natural justice and fairness by not providing adequate opportunity for a hearing before passing revised assessment orders. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The first respondent was directed to schedule a new hearing, ensuring the petitioner's timely notification and submission of relevant documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the first respondent was required to issue appropriate orders in compliance with the law, with no costs imposed on the parties. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169049