https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169059 Concurrent factual findings that the goods were duly accounted for, paid by cheque, covered by Form C and accompanied by the relevant documents negated any intention to evade tax under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. On those findings, the appellate authority and Tribunal found no error, and in revision no infirmity or question of law was shown to justify interference. The result was that revisional interference was unwarranted and the penalty issue was not disturbed. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:09:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169059 Concurrent factual findings that the goods were duly accounted for, paid by cheque, covered by Form C and accompanied by the relevant documents negated any intention to evade tax under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. On those findings, the appellate authority and Tribunal found no error, and in revision no infirmity or question of law was shown to justify interference. The result was that revisional interference was unwarranted and the penalty issue was not disturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169059