<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1286 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169074</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 77(8) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was upheld because the goods were found in the dealer&#039;s custody without any entry in the books and without a purchase bill or voucher. The dealer&#039;s contemporaneous admission that the goods had been purchased without bill, that no accounting entry had been made, and that penalty could be imposed supported the tax authorities&#039; action. A later plea of coercion and subsequent documents were rejected as a belated afterthought. The Tax Board erred in deleting the penalty, and the restoration of penalty in favour of the Revenue was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1286 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169074</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 77(8) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was upheld because the goods were found in the dealer&#039;s custody without any entry in the books and without a purchase bill or voucher. The dealer&#039;s contemporaneous admission that the goods had been purchased without bill, that no accounting entry had been made, and that penalty could be imposed supported the tax authorities&#039; action. A later plea of coercion and subsequent documents were rejected as a belated afterthought. The Tax Board erred in deleting the penalty, and the restoration of penalty in favour of the Revenue was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>