<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. The Assessing Officer was instructed to provide the assessee with a hearing and make a fresh decision based on the evidence presented, as there was no proof that the work related to the income addition was completed in the relevant assessment year. The decision was rendered on November 27, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. The Assessing Officer was instructed to provide the assessee with a hearing and make a fresh decision based on the evidence presented, as there was no proof that the work related to the income addition was completed in the relevant assessment year. The decision was rendered on November 27, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>