<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 951 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169114</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of 30 percent of the sale proceeds of mahogany trees as capital gain, rejecting the claim of the assessee for agricultural income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was dismissed, affirming the treatment of the sale proceeds as capital gain due to the absence of cost of acquisition or improvement on the asset, as per legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 951 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169114</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of 30 percent of the sale proceeds of mahogany trees as capital gain, rejecting the claim of the assessee for agricultural income. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was dismissed, affirming the treatment of the sale proceeds as capital gain due to the absence of cost of acquisition or improvement on the asset, as per legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>