<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 982 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168964</link>
    <description>The court, comprising M.R. Shah and Sonia Gokani, JJ., dismissed the State of Gujarat&#039;s application to condone a 1205-day delay in preferring a Tax Appeal against a judgment by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. Despite arguments citing significant financial impact and legal precedents, the court found the explanation for delay insufficient, emphasizing that judicial discretion in condoning delays must be reasonable. Consequently, the Tax Appeal was dismissed due to the delay, but the court left the question of law open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 982 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168964</link>
      <description>The court, comprising M.R. Shah and Sonia Gokani, JJ., dismissed the State of Gujarat&#039;s application to condone a 1205-day delay in preferring a Tax Appeal against a judgment by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. Despite arguments citing significant financial impact and legal precedents, the court found the explanation for delay insufficient, emphasizing that judicial discretion in condoning delays must be reasonable. Consequently, the Tax Appeal was dismissed due to the delay, but the court left the question of law open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>