<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1283 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168970</link>
    <description>Section 6(2) of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 confers discretion on the assessing authority to levy penalty up to one and a half times the tax assessed where escape from assessment is attributable to wilful non-disclosure. On the facts and circumstances noted, that discretionary power justified moderation of the penalty. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2,00,000, and the remainder of the revisional order was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1283 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168970</link>
      <description>Section 6(2) of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 confers discretion on the assessing authority to levy penalty up to one and a half times the tax assessed where escape from assessment is attributable to wilful non-disclosure. On the facts and circumstances noted, that discretionary power justified moderation of the penalty. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2,00,000, and the remainder of the revisional order was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>