<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1514 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168973</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was challenged because the endorsement rejecting rectification and the reassessment order were passed without examining the books of account. The High Court noted that, although the assessee had not produced the books when first called upon, the authority had proceeded without verifying the material relevant to the rectification request. The appropriate course was to allow the assessee to appear with its books and records so the application could be reconsidered on verification of the evidence. The endorsement was quashed and reconsideration was directed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:06:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1514 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168973</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was challenged because the endorsement rejecting rectification and the reassessment order were passed without examining the books of account. The High Court noted that, although the assessee had not produced the books when first called upon, the authority had proceeded without verifying the material relevant to the rectification request. The appropriate course was to allow the assessee to appear with its books and records so the application could be reconsidered on verification of the evidence. The endorsement was quashed and reconsideration was directed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>