<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1615 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168984</link>
    <description>Carrying goods in transit with a blank Form ST 18A declaration did not satisfy the statutory requirement of proper declaration under section 78(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. The blank form amounted to non-compliance with the transit declaration mandate, and such incomplete declaration was sufficient to attract penalty under section 78(5). The absence of an alleged intention to evade tax did not assist the assessee because the statutory condition itself was not met. The penalty was therefore justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1615 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168984</link>
      <description>Carrying goods in transit with a blank Form ST 18A declaration did not satisfy the statutory requirement of proper declaration under section 78(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. The blank form amounted to non-compliance with the transit declaration mandate, and such incomplete declaration was sufficient to attract penalty under section 78(5). The absence of an alleged intention to evade tax did not assist the assessee because the statutory condition itself was not met. The penalty was therefore justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>