<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 861 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168955</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether the movement of goods was a stock transfer attracting Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, or a job-work arrangement outside stock transfer treatment. The assessment and revisional orders proceeded on a stock-transfer basis and noted absence of Form F, while the appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s job-work case. The record was found insufficient to conclusively determine the true nature of the transaction, and the matter had not been properly examined on evidence. The issue was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication after both sides were given an opportunity to produce evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:05:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 861 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168955</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether the movement of goods was a stock transfer attracting Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, or a job-work arrangement outside stock transfer treatment. The assessment and revisional orders proceeded on a stock-transfer basis and noted absence of Form F, while the appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s job-work case. The record was found insufficient to conclusively determine the true nature of the transaction, and the matter had not been properly examined on evidence. The issue was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication after both sides were given an opportunity to produce evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>