<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 672 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168946</link>
    <description>An application for compounding tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax regime, filed after the prescribed time and without payment by the cut-off date, could not be entertained under rule 11 or section 8. The doctrines of implied powers and substantial compliance apply only to incidental powers needed to effect an express statutory power; they do not authorise acceptance of a time-barred filing or condonation of delay caused by the assessee&#039;s default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 672 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168946</link>
      <description>An application for compounding tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax regime, filed after the prescribed time and without payment by the cut-off date, could not be entertained under rule 11 or section 8. The doctrines of implied powers and substantial compliance apply only to incidental powers needed to effect an express statutory power; they do not authorise acceptance of a time-barred filing or condonation of delay caused by the assessee&#039;s default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>