<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168931</link>
    <description>In a parliamentary constitutional scheme, the President and the Governor ordinarily exercise executive and other constitutional powers on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, with personal discretion confined to areas expressly granted by the Constitution. A probationer&#039;s termination is punitive where, in substance, it rests on misconduct, stigma, or disciplinary findings, and such an order attracts constitutional protection under Article 311(2) and must comply with the service rules. The termination orders were found punitive and invalid, and relief followed, while the ministerial-advice position for constitutional heads was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 17:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168931</link>
      <description>In a parliamentary constitutional scheme, the President and the Governor ordinarily exercise executive and other constitutional powers on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, with personal discretion confined to areas expressly granted by the Constitution. A probationer&#039;s termination is punitive where, in substance, it rests on misconduct, stigma, or disciplinary findings, and such an order attracts constitutional protection under Article 311(2) and must comply with the service rules. The termination orders were found punitive and invalid, and relief followed, while the ministerial-advice position for constitutional heads was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>