https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168924 The Supreme Court held that the implementation of the Indo-Pakistan Western Boundary Case Tribunal's award did not require a constitutional amendment as it was a settlement of a boundary dispute, not a cession of Indian territory. The Court affirmed the executive's authority under the Indian Constitution to implement international treaties and awards without legislative intervention, provided citizen rights or existing laws are not affected. The Court dismissed petitions challenging the implementation, stating that most petitioners lacked standing as the award did not involve cession of Indian territory. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:19:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168924 The Supreme Court held that the implementation of the Indo-Pakistan Western Boundary Case Tribunal's award did not require a constitutional amendment as it was a settlement of a boundary dispute, not a cession of Indian territory. The Court affirmed the executive's authority under the Indian Constitution to implement international treaties and awards without legislative intervention, provided citizen rights or existing laws are not affected. The Court dismissed petitions challenging the implementation, stating that most petitioners lacked standing as the award did not involve cession of Indian territory. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168924